| Title |
Reporting of screening and diagnostic AI rarely acknowledges ethical, legal, and social implications: a mass media frame analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-020-01353-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma K. Frost, Stacy M. Carter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 29% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Ghana | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Librarian | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 20% |
| Unknown | 28 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,240,277
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#639
of 2,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,881
of 527,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#12
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.