↓ Skip to main content

Role of bicarbonate as a pH buffer and electron sink in microbial dechlorination of chloroethenes

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,582)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of bicarbonate as a pH buffer and electron sink in microbial dechlorination of chloroethenes
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2859-11-128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anca G Delgado, Prathap Parameswaran, Devyn Fajardo-Williams, Rolf U Halden, Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown

Abstract

Buffering to achieve pH control is crucial for successful trichloroethene (TCE) anaerobic bioremediation. Bicarbonate (HCO3-) is the natural buffer in groundwater and the buffer of choice in the laboratory and at contaminated sites undergoing biological treatment with organohalide respiring microorganisms. However, HCO3- also serves as the electron acceptor for hydrogenotrophic methanogens and hydrogenotrophic homoacetogens, two microbial groups competing with organohalide respirers for hydrogen (H2). We studied the effect of HCO3- as a buffering agent and the effect of HCO3--consuming reactions in a range of concentrations (2.5-30 mM) with an initial pH of 7.5 in H2-fed TCE reductively dechlorinating communities containing Dehalococcoides, hydrogenotrophic methanogens, and hydrogenotrophic homoacetogens.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 65 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 28%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2014.
All research outputs
#1,460,745
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#28
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,449
of 168,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.