You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13195-020-00734-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susanne Röhr, Alexander Pabst, Steffi G. Riedel-Heller, Frank Jessen, Yuda Turana, Yvonne S. Handajani, Carol Brayne, Fiona E. Matthews, Blossom C. M. Stephan, Richard B. Lipton, Mindy J. Katz, Cuiling Wang, Maëlenn Guerchet, Pierre-Marie Preux, Pascal Mbelesso, Karen Ritchie, Marie-Laure Ancelin, Isabelle Carrière, Antonio Guaita, Annalisa Davin, Roberta Vaccaro, Ki Woong Kim, Ji Won Han, Seung Wan Suh, Suzana Shahar, Normah C. Din, Divya Vanoh, Martin van Boxtel, Sebastian Köhler, Mary Ganguli, Erin P. Jacobsen, Beth E. Snitz, Kaarin J. Anstey, Nicolas Cherbuin, Shuzo Kumagai, Sanmei Chen, Kenji Narazaki, Tze Pin Ng, Qi Gao, Xinyi Gwee, Henry Brodaty, Nicole A. Kochan, Julian Trollor, Antonio Lobo, Raúl López-Antón, Javier Santabárbara, John D. Crawford, Darren M. Lipnicki, Perminder S. Sachdev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Germany | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 50 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 57 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,828,944
of 24,633,436 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#324
of 1,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,204
of 513,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#21
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,633,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.