↓ Skip to main content

Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating prevalence of subjective cognitive decline in and across international cohort studies of aging: a COSMIC study
Published in
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13195-020-00734-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susanne Röhr, Alexander Pabst, Steffi G. Riedel-Heller, Frank Jessen, Yuda Turana, Yvonne S. Handajani, Carol Brayne, Fiona E. Matthews, Blossom C. M. Stephan, Richard B. Lipton, Mindy J. Katz, Cuiling Wang, Maëlenn Guerchet, Pierre-Marie Preux, Pascal Mbelesso, Karen Ritchie, Marie-Laure Ancelin, Isabelle Carrière, Antonio Guaita, Annalisa Davin, Roberta Vaccaro, Ki Woong Kim, Ji Won Han, Seung Wan Suh, Suzana Shahar, Normah C. Din, Divya Vanoh, Martin van Boxtel, Sebastian Köhler, Mary Ganguli, Erin P. Jacobsen, Beth E. Snitz, Kaarin J. Anstey, Nicolas Cherbuin, Shuzo Kumagai, Sanmei Chen, Kenji Narazaki, Tze Pin Ng, Qi Gao, Xinyi Gwee, Henry Brodaty, Nicole A. Kochan, Julian Trollor, Antonio Lobo, Raúl López-Antón, Javier Santabárbara, John D. Crawford, Darren M. Lipnicki, Perminder S. Sachdev

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Researcher 10 13%
Unspecified 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Unspecified 6 8%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 30 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,307,362
of 19,884,221 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#205
of 1,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,859
of 469,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
#40
of 169 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,884,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 169 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.