↓ Skip to main content

The rules of the game: interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
166 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rules of the game: interprofessional collaboration on the intensive care unit team
Published in
Critical Care, October 2004
DOI 10.1186/cc2958
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorelei Lingard, Sherry Espin, Cathy Evans, Laura Hawryluck

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 212 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 14%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 70 32%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 14%
Social Sciences 30 14%
Psychology 12 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 35 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,397
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,795
of 76,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.