You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of coronary artery lesions in indolent kawasaki disease following initial spontaneous defervescence: a retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pediatric Rheumatology, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12969-015-0042-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takuto Takahashi, Hiroshi Sakakibara, Yoshihiko Morikawa, Masaru Miura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 26% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 47% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#296
of 717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,834
of 286,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#5
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.