↓ Skip to main content

Late initiation of renal replacement therapy is associated with worse outcomes in acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Late initiation of renal replacement therapy is associated with worse outcomes in acute kidney injury after major abdominal surgery
Published in
Critical Care, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/cc8147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chih-Chung Shiao, Vin-Cent Wu, Wen-Yi Li, Yu-Feng Lin, Fu-Chang Hu, Guang-Huar Young, Chin-Chi Kuo, Tze-Wah Kao, Down-Ming Huang, Yung-Ming Chen, Pi-Ru Tsai, Shuei-Liong Lin, Nai-Kuan Chou, Tzu-Hsin Lin, Yu-Chang Yeh, Chih-Hsien Wang, Anne Chou, Wen-Je Ko, Kwan-Dun Wu, the National Taiwan University Surgical Intensive Care Unit-Associated Renal Failure (NSARF) Study Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Malaysia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Iceland 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 86 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 16%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 29 31%
Unknown 3 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 74%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 7 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2013.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,396
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,571
of 108,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.