You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal local excision for rectal carcinoid: a comparative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12957-016-0923-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fei-hu Yan, Zheng Lou, Shi-jie Hu, Xiao-dong Xu, Hao Wang, Han-tao Wang, Rong-gui Meng, Chuan-gang Fu, Wei Zhang, Jian He, En-da Yu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#244
of 2,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,744
of 354,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,076 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.