↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of topical versus intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of topical versus intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0512-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao-ping Chen, Yu-min Chen, Jian-bao Jiao, Yun-fei Wang, Li-gang Qian, Zhao Guo, Zheng Ma, Cui-yu Han, Tong-huan Shi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Materials Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#332
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,718
of 419,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#9
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.