You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: A randomised controlled feasibility study of interpersonal art psychotherapy for the treatment of aggression in people with intellectual disabilities in secure care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00743-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon S. Hackett, Ania Zubala, Katie Aafjes-van Doorn, Thomas Chadwick, Toni Leigh Harrison, Jane Bourne, Mark Freeston, Andrew Jahoda, John L. Taylor, Cono Ariti, Rachel McNamara, Lindsay Pennington, Elaine McColl, Eileen Kaner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2020.
All research outputs
#18,778,496
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#858
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#374,893
of 502,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#45
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.