You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human breast milk as source of sphingolipids for newborns: comparison with infant formulas and commercial cow’s milk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-020-02641-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michele Dei Cas, Rita Paroni, Paola Signorelli, Alessandra Mirarchi, Laura Cerquiglini, Stefania Troiani, Samuela Cataldi, Michela Codini, Tommaso Beccari, Riccardo Ghidoni, Elisabetta Albi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#16,722,924
of 24,593,555 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,513
of 4,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,519
of 516,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#56
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,555 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.