↓ Skip to main content

Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 8,766)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
40 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
442 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
444 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
784 Mendeley
Title
Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-06001-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Ladds, Alex Rushforth, Sietse Wieringa, Sharon Taylor, Clare Rayner, Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 442 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 784 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 784 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 84 11%
Researcher 76 10%
Student > Bachelor 70 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 5%
Other 41 5%
Other 138 18%
Unknown 332 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 152 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 75 10%
Social Sciences 39 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 3%
Psychology 25 3%
Other 109 14%
Unknown 358 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 638. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#35,083
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 8,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,207
of 530,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.