↓ Skip to main content

Effect of UK policy on medical migration: a time series analysis of physician registration data

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of UK policy on medical migration: a time series analysis of physician registration data
Published in
Human Resources for Health, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-10-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claire Blacklock, Carl Heneghan, David Mant, Alison M Ward

Abstract

Economically developed countries have recruited large numbers of overseas health workers to fill domestic shortages. Recognition of the negative impact this can have on health care in developing countries led the United Kingdom Department of Health to issue a Code of Practice for National Health Service (NHS) employers in 1999 providing ethical guidance on international recruitment. Case reports suggest this guidance had limited influence in the context of other NHS policy priorities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 1%
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 79 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 32%
Social Sciences 15 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,165,601
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#580
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,005
of 190,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.