| Title |
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic and diabetes on mechanical reperfusion in patients with STEMI: insights from the ISACS STEMI COVID 19 Registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cardiovascular Diabetology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12933-020-01196-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppe De Luca, Miha Cercek, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Marija Vavlukis, Lucian Calmac, Tom Johnson, Gerard Roura i Ferrer, Vladimir Ganyukov, Wojtek Wojakowski, Clemens von Birgelen, Francesco Versaci, Jurrien Ten Berg, Mika Laine, Maurits Dirksen, Gianni Casella, Petr Kala, José Luis Díez Gil, Victor Becerra, Ciro De Simone, Xavier Carrill, Alessandra Scoccia, Arpad Lux, Tomas Kovarnik, Periklis Davlouros, Gabriele Gabrielli, Xacobe Flores Rios, Nikola Bakraceski, Sébastien Levesque, Vincenzo Guiducci, Michał Kidawa, Lucia Marinucci, Filippo Zilio, Gennaro Galasso, Enrico Fabris, Maurizio Menichelli, Stephane Manzo, Gianluca Caiazzo, Jose Moreu, Juan Sanchis Forés, Luca Donazzan, Luigi Vignali, Rui Teles, Francisco Bosa Ojeda, Heidi Lehtola, Santiago Camacho-Freiere, Adriaan Kraaijeveld, Ylitalo Antti, Marco Boccalatte, Iñigo Lozano Martínez-Luengas, Bruno Scheller, Dimitrios Alexopoulos, Giuseppe Uccello, Benjamin Faurie, Alejandro Gutierrez Barrios, Bor Wilbert, Giuliana Cortese, Raul Moreno, Guido Parodi, Elvin Kedhi, Monica Verdoia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Librarian | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#20,575,286
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#1,281
of 1,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#385,247
of 528,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Diabetology
#37
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 528,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.