You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mitochondrial phylogeography of baboons (Papiospp.) – Indication for introgressive hybridization?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-9-83 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dietmar Zinner, Linn F Groeneveld, Christina Keller, Christian Roos |
| Abstract |
Baboons of the genus Papio are distributed over wide ranges of Africa and even colonized parts of the Arabian Peninsula. Traditionally, five phenotypically distinct species are recognized, but recent molecular studies were not able to resolve their phylogenetic relationships. Moreover, these studies revealed para- and polyphyletic (hereafter paraphyletic) mitochondrial clades for baboons from eastern Africa, and it was hypothesized that introgressive hybridization might have contributed substantially to their evolutionary history. To further elucidate the phylogenetic relationships among baboons, we extended earlier studies by analysing the complete mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and the 'Brown region' from 67 specimens collected at 53 sites, which represent all species and which cover most of the baboons' range. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 236 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 26% |
| Researcher | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 167 | 66% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,676
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,688
of 106,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#17
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.