You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hybrid gold-iron oxide nanoparticles as a multifunctional platform for biomedical application
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-10-27 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Clare Hoskins, Yue Min, Mariana Gueorguieva, Craig McDougall, Alexander Volovick, Paul Prentice, Zhigang Wang, Andreas Melzer, Alfred Cuschieri, Lijun Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
India | 2 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 162 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 31% |
Researcher | 24 | 14% |
Student > Master | 20 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 18% |
Unknown | 18 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 48 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 12% |
Materials Science | 17 | 10% |
Physics and Astronomy | 13 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 6% |
Other | 33 | 20% |
Unknown | 27 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2014.
All research outputs
#4,719,239
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#155
of 1,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,749
of 164,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,424 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.