The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
High type II error and interpretation inconsistencies when attempting to refute transgenerational epigenetic inheritance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-016-0982-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carlos Guerrero-Bosagna |
Abstract |
A recently published article in Genome Biology attempts to refute important aspects of the phenomenon of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance (TEI). An alternative explanation of the data is offered here, showing that TEI is indeed not contradicted.Please see related Correspondence article: www.dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-0981-5 and related Research article: http://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-015-0619-z. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 50% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 20% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 28% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#4,093
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,331
of 370,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#55
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.