↓ Skip to main content

Meeting the needs of women who use drugs and alcohol in North-east India – a challenge for HIV prevention services

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meeting the needs of women who use drugs and alcohol in North-east India – a challenge for HIV prevention services
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-825
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Kermode, Chinzaning Hangzo Songput, Collins Z Sono, Temjen Nungsang Jamir, Alex Devine

Abstract

The North-east Indian states of Manipur and Nagaland consistently report relatively high HIV prevalence. The targeted HIV prevention interventions in these two states are mostly delivered by non-government organizations (NGOs), and prevention of HIV transmission by injecting drug use is their main focus. Most injecting drug users (IDUs) are male, and the services are primarily tailored to meet their needs, which are not necessarily the same as those for women. This qualitative study describes the health service needs of women who use drugs and alcohol in Manipur and Nagaland, with the goal of identifying strategies and activities that can be implemented by NGOs wanting to improve their reach among vulnerable women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 23%
Social Sciences 31 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Psychology 19 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 54 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,133,487
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,221
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,675
of 173,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#13
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.