↓ Skip to main content

Accurate variant detection across non-amplified and whole genome amplified DNA using targeted next generation sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accurate variant detection across non-amplified and whole genome amplified DNA using targeted next generation sequencing
Published in
BMC Genomics, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-500
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdou ElSharawy, Jason Warner, Jeff Olson, Michael Forster, Markus B Schilhabel, Darren R Link, Stefan Rose-John, Stefan Schreiber, Philip Rosenstiel, James Brayer, Andre Franke

Abstract

Many hypothesis-driven genetic studies require the ability to comprehensively and efficiently target specific regions of the genome to detect sequence variations. Often, sample availability is limited requiring the use of whole genome amplification (WGA). We evaluated a high-throughput microdroplet-based PCR approach in combination with next generation sequencing (NGS) to target 384 discrete exons from 373 genes involved in cancer. In our evaluation, we compared the performance of six non-amplified gDNA samples from two HapMap family trios. Three of these samples were also preamplified by WGA and evaluated. We tested sample pooling or multiplexing strategies at different stages of the tested targeted NGS (T-NGS) workflow.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 8%
Germany 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 70 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,487,238
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,872
of 10,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,241
of 170,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#24
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,615 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.