↓ Skip to main content

Reflections on key methodological decisions in national burden of disease assessments

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Public Health, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Reflections on key methodological decisions in national burden of disease assessments
Published in
Archives of Public Health, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13690-020-00519-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elena von der Lippe, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Michelle Gourley, Juanita Haagsma, Henk Hilderink, Michael Porst, Annelene Wengler, Grant Wyper, Ian Grant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 24 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 26 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,378,858
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#102
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,596
of 519,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.