↓ Skip to main content

Screening for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer: protocol for systematic reviews to inform Canadian recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer: protocol for systematic reviews to inform Canadian recommendations
Published in
Systematic Reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01538-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison Gates, Jennifer Pillay, Donna Reynolds, Rob Stirling, Gregory Traversy, Christina Korownyk, Ainsley Moore, Guylène Thériault, Brett D. Thombs, Julian Little, Catherine Popadiuk, Dirk van Niekerk, Diana Keto-Lambert, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Hartling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 48 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 46 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#20,676,689
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,936
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#429,011
of 502,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#68
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.