The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Syndrome latex‐fruit: report of a case with cassava anaphylaxis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-3-s3-p155 |
Authors |
ZM Almeida Sanchez, GL Hernandez Santana, E Rodriguez Plata, JA Martinez Tadeo, JC Garcia Robaina, C Gonzalez Colino |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,872,948
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#90
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,044
of 198,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.