You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusions for pain relief in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12871-020-01218-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maciej Kaszyński, Dorota Lewandowska, Piotr Sawicki, Piotr Wojcieszak, Izabela Pągowska-Klimek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 43% |
United States | 2 | 29% |
New Zealand | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Members of the public | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 15% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 6 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 35 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,392,010
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#306
of 1,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,174
of 502,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#9
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,527 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.