↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with the non-use of insecticide-treated nets in Rwandan children

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with the non-use of insecticide-treated nets in Rwandan children
Published in
Malaria Journal, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12936-016-1403-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monique Murindahabi Ruyange, Jeanine Condo, Corine Karema, Agnes Binagwaho, Alphonse Rukundo, Yvette Muyirukazi

Abstract

Insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) are highly effective in reducing malaria burden when used properly. However, factors related to individuals, households and community may influence how ITNs are used for malaria control. The study examined influences exerted at these levels to determine if they are associated with ITN non-use among children under 5 years of age in Rwanda. Using data from the 2010 Rwanda Demographic Health Survey, the investigation was done on the factors associated with ITN non-use among children under 5 years. Descriptive statistics as well as univariate and multilevel logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with ITN non-use. Responses from a total of 6173 women aged 15-49 years living in 492 villages were included in the analysis. Risk factors for children not utilizing ITNs (25 %) included: (Odds ratio [95 % confidence interval]) households with more than five members (1.42 [1.23-1.63]), employed mother (1.33 [1.06-1.66]), and lower household altitude (1.36 [1.14-1.61]). Protective risk factors for ITN use included households with more than three nets (0.39 [0.33-0.47]), mothers who attended one to four visits at antenatal clinics during pregnancy (0.45 [0.29-0.69]), more than four antenatal clinic visits during pregnancy (0.39 [0.21-0.70]), mothers married or living with partner (0.43 [0.36-0.52]), mothers with any education level (0.77 [0.65-0.91]), and households with higher community wealth quintile (0.71 [0.59-0.84]). Rwanda has achieved high coverage of ITN use and proper use has contributed to a decline in malaria in Rwanda; however, maintaining universal ITN coverage is not enough to protect citizens from this disease. Risk factors related to ITN non-use at individual, household and community level include poverty, education, birth spacing, and antenatal clinic attendance. There is a need to address findings with strategies to mitigate the non-use of ITNs for effective malaria prevention in Rwanda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 25%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 44 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 20%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 43 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#17,811,101
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,867
of 5,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,556
of 354,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#108
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.