↓ Skip to main content

Cost-effectiveness of counseling and pedometer use to increase physical activity in the Netherlands: a modeling study

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost-effectiveness of counseling and pedometer use to increase physical activity in the Netherlands: a modeling study
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-10-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eelco AB Over, GC Wanda Wendel-Vos, Matthijs van den Berg, Heleen H Hamberg-van Reenen, Luqman Tariq, Rudolf T Hoogenveen, Pieter HM van Baal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 17%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Psychology 4 10%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,292,663
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#301
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,030
of 190,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them