You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COVID-19-related medical research: a meta-research and critical appraisal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-01190-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marc Raynaud, Huanxi Zhang, Kevin Louis, Valentin Goutaudier, Jiali Wang, Quentin Dubourg, Yongcheng Wei, Zeynep Demir, Charlotte Debiais, Olivier Aubert, Yassine Bouatou, Carmen Lefaucheur, Patricia Jabre, Longshan Liu, Changxi Wang, Xavier Jouven, Peter Reese, Jean-Philippe Empana, Alexandre Loupy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 13% |
| France | 13 | 9% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| India | 6 | 4% |
| Japan | 5 | 3% |
| Sweden | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 66 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 93 | 63% |
| Scientists | 30 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 201. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#199,647
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#8
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,802
of 530,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.