↓ Skip to main content

Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgical Oncology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting necrosis in residual mass analysis after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a retrospective study
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7819-10-203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduardo de Paula Miranda, Daniel Kanda Abe, Adriano João Nesrallah, Sabrina Thalita dos Reis, Alexandre Crippa, Miguel Srougi, Marcos Francisco Dall’Oglio

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that pathological analysis of retroperitoneal residual masses of patients with testicular germ cell tumors revealed findings of necrotic debris or fibrosis in up to 50% of patients. We aimed at pursuing a clinical and pathological review of patients undergoing post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in order to identify variables that may help predict necrosis in the retroperitoneum.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 22%
Researcher 4 22%
Professor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 72%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2012.
All research outputs
#15,055,021
of 18,796,975 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#827
of 1,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,468
of 146,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,796,975 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,666 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.