You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ten recommendations to improve pharmacy practice in low and middle-income countries (LMICs)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40545-020-00288-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 26% |
| Pakistan | 3 | 13% |
| Egypt | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 5 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 55 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,115,626
of 24,761,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#45
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,416
of 515,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,761,242 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.