You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of qigong on systolic and diastolic blood pressure lowering: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12906-020-03172-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Siew Mooi Ching, Naidu Ragubathi Mokshashri, Maharajan Mari Kannan, Kai Wei Lee, Nurin Amalina Sallahuddin, Jun Xun Ng, Jie Lin Wong, Navin Kumar Devaraj, Fan Kee Hoo, Yee Shen Loo, Sajesh K. Veettil |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| India | 2 | 11% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,262,192
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#198
of 3,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,677
of 520,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#5
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.