You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Generalised cost-effectiveness analysis of 159 health interventions for the Ethiopian essential health service package
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12962-020-00255-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Getachew Teshome Eregata, Alemayehu Hailu, Karin Stenberg, Kjell Arne Johansson, Ole Frithjof Norheim, Melanie Y. Bertram |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 3 | 17% |
| Georgia | 1 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,702,969
of 25,440,205 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#28
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,217
of 520,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,440,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.