↓ Skip to main content

Health insurance and quality of care: Comparing perceptions of quality between insured and uninsured patients in Ghana’s hospitals

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
225 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health insurance and quality of care: Comparing perceptions of quality between insured and uninsured patients in Ghana’s hospitals
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12939-016-0365-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron A. Abuosi, Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh, Joshua Yindenaba Abor, Edward Nketiah-Amponsah

Abstract

The introduction of health insurance in Ghana in 2003 has resulted in a tremendous increase in utilization of health services. However, concerns are being raised about the quality of patient care. Some of the concerns include long waiting times, verbal abuse of patients by health care providers, inadequate physical examination by doctors and discrimination of insured patients. The study compares perceptions of quality of care between insured and uninsured out-patients in selected hospitals in Ghana to determine whether there is any unequal treatment between insured and uninsured patients in terms of quality of care, as empirical and anecdotal evidence seem to suggest. A cross-sectional survey of 818 out-patients was conducted in 17 general hospitals from three regions of Ghana. These are the Upper East, Brong Ahafo and Central Regions. Convenience sampling was employed to select the patients in exit interviews. Descriptive statistics, including frequency distributions, means and standard deviations, were used to describe socio-economic and demographic characteristics of respondents. Factor analysis was used to determine distinct quality of care constructs; t-test statistic was used to test for differences in quality perceptions between the insured and uninsured patients; and regression analysis was used to test the association between health insurance and quality of care. Overall, there was no significant difference in perceptions of quality between insured and uninsured patients. However, there was a significant difference between insured and uninsured patients in respect of financial access to care. The major quality of care concern affecting all patients was the problem of inadequate resources, especially lack of doctors, lack of drugs and other basic supplies and equipment to work with. It was concluded that generally, insured and uninsured patients are not treated unequally, contrary to prevailing anecdotal and empirical evidence. On the contrary, quality of care is a concern of both insured and uninsured patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 224 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 21%
Student > Postgraduate 22 10%
Researcher 18 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 41 18%
Unknown 65 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 8%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 5%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 72 32%