↓ Skip to main content

Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
71 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon Agley, Yunyu Xiao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 341 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 13%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 7%
Student > Bachelor 23 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 67 20%
Unknown 131 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 44 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Psychology 22 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Other 71 21%
Unknown 136 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 183. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
#223,107
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#206
of 17,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,484
of 530,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#5
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.