You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economic evaluation of a web-based menu planning intervention to improve childcare service adherence with dietary guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-01068-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Penny Reeves, Kim Edmunds, Zoe Szewczyk, Alice Grady, Sze Lin Yoong, Luke Wolfenden, Rebecca Wyse, Meghan Finch, Fiona Stacey, John Wiggers, Andrew Searles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 36% |
| Ireland | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,791,617
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#994
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,284
of 503,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.