You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Table Talk: revision of an observational tool to characterize the feeding environment in early care and education settings
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-10087-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taren Swindle, Josh Phelps, Nicole M. McBride, James P. Selig, Julie M. Rutledge, Swapna Manyam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 30% |
United States | 2 | 20% |
Ireland | 2 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 40% |
Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Members of the public | 2 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 20 | 54% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,123,400
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,859
of 17,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,915
of 529,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#160
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.