You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic early versus late mobilization or standard early mobilization in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-03446-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dominik Menges, Bianca Seiler, Yuki Tomonaga, Matthias Schwenkglenks, Milo A. Puhan, Henock G. Yebyo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 21% |
Japan | 5 | 15% |
United States | 3 | 9% |
Brazil | 2 | 6% |
Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 22 | 65% |
Scientists | 6 | 18% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
Researcher | 16 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 5% |
Other | 42 | 19% |
Unknown | 108 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 19% |
Unspecified | 8 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
Other | 12 | 5% |
Unknown | 115 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,464,482
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,280
of 6,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,045
of 526,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#39
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 526,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.