↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative planning for implant placement with consideration of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty: postoperative efficacy evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preoperative planning for implant placement with consideration of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty: postoperative efficacy evaluation
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12891-016-1120-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yutaka Inaba, Naomi Kobayashi, Haruka Suzuki, Hiroyuki Ike, So Kubota, Tomoyuki Saito

Abstract

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), tilting of the pelvis alters the cup placement angles. Thus, the cup angles need to be planned with consideration of the effects of pelvic tilt. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy of preoperative planning for implant placement with consideration of pelvic tilt in THA, and the accuracy of a CT-based computer navigation for implant positioning. We examined 75 hips of 75 patients who underwent THA and were followed-up for one year postoperatively. The patients were divided into three groups (anterior, intermediate, posterior tilt) according to their preoperative pelvic tilt. Preoperative planning for implant placement was made with consideration of pelvic tilt and a CT-based navigation was used to execute the preoperative planning. Cup inclination, cup anteversion, and combined anteversion (CA) in supine and standing positions were examined 1 year after THA. The accuracy of the computer navigation was also examined. Mean CA was 35.0 ± 5.8° in supine position and 39.3 ± 5.7° in standing position. CA did not differ among the three subgroups (anterior, intermediate, posterior tilt) in either supine or standing position, indicating implant placements to be equally effective. The desired CA (37.3°) was midway between those in supine and standing positions for each subgroup. Respective mean absolute errors between preoperative planning and postoperative CT measurement was 5.3 ± 5.2° for CA. We obtained favorable THA results with preoperative planning with consideration of pelvic tilt by demonstrating supine and standing CA to be unaffected by preoperative pelvic tilt one year postoperatively. Mean absolute error of CA between preoperative planning and postoperative measurement was 5° with use of the CT-based navigation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 15%
Researcher 8 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 18 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 53%
Engineering 6 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,666,915
of 23,341,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,559
of 4,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,976
of 356,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#37
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,341,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.