↓ Skip to main content

Health and demographic surveillance systems: a step towards full civil registration and vital statistics system in sub-Sahara Africa?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health and demographic surveillance systems: a step towards full civil registration and vital statistics system in sub-Sahara Africa?
Published in
BMC Public Health, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yazoume Ye, Marilyn Wamukoya, Alex Ezeh, Jacques B O Emina, Osman Sankoh

Abstract

In the developed world, information on vital events is routinely collected nationally to inform population and health policies. However, in many low-and middle-income countries, especially those in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), there is a lack of effective and comprehensive national civil registration and vital statistics system. In the past decades, the number of Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSSs) has increased throughout SSA. An HDSS monitors births, deaths, causes of death, migration, and other health and socio-economic indicators within a defined population over time. Currently, the International Network for the Continuous Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health (INDEPTH) brings together 38 member research centers which run 44 HDSS sites from 20 countries in Africa, Asia and Oceana. Thirty two of these HDSS sites are in SSA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
India 4 1%
United States 3 1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 264 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 16%
Researcher 44 16%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Professor 11 4%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 58 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 21%
Social Sciences 57 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 71 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,749,503
of 23,504,694 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,926
of 15,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,288
of 170,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#30
of 333 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 333 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.