You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of inadequate, indeterminate, false-negative and false-positive cases in cytological examination for breast cancer according to histological type
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Diagnostic Pathology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-1596-7-53 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rin Yamaguchi, Shin-ichi Tsuchiya, Takashi Koshikawa, Toshiro Yokoyama, Kuniko Mibuchi, Yasuhide Nonaka, Sonoe Ito, Hidejiro Higuchi, Mariko Nagao, Koichi Higaki, Jiro Watanabe, Masayoshi Kage, Hirohisa Yano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 65% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#17,571,083
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#589
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,328
of 176,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.