You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of the protective effects of icariin on nicotine-induced reproductive toxicity in male mouse –a pilot study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12958-020-00620-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guochao Ni, Xuhui Zhang, Seth Yaw Afedo, Rong Rui |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,664,272
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#552
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,057
of 399,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#10
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.