You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Linkage disequilibrium mapping for grain Fe and Zn enhancing QTLs useful for nutrient dense rice breeding
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12870-020-2262-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. K. Pradhan, E. Pandit, S. Pawar, R. Naveenkumar, S. R. Barik, S. P. Mohanty, D. K. Nayak, S. K. Ghritlahre, D. Sanjiba Rao, J. N. Reddy, S. S. C. Patnaik |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 35% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#15,664,272
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,504
of 3,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,274
of 450,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#44
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.