↓ Skip to main content

Low protein diets in patients with chronic kidney disease: a bridge between mainstream and complementary-alternative medicines?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low protein diets in patients with chronic kidney disease: a bridge between mainstream and complementary-alternative medicines?
Published in
BMC Nephrology, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12882-016-0275-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giorgina Barbara Piccoli, Irene Capizzi, Federica Neve Vigotti, Filomena Leone, Claudia D’Alessandro, Domenica Giuffrida, Marta Nazha, Simona Roggero, Nicoletta Colombi, Giuseppe Mauro, Natascia Castelluccia, Adamasco Cupisti, Paolo Avagnina

Abstract

Dietary therapy represents an important tool in the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD), mainly through a balanced reduction of protein intake aimed at giving the remnant nephrons in damaged kidneys a "functional rest". While dialysis, transplantation, and pharmacological therapies are usually seen as "high tech" medicine, non pharmacological interventions, including diets, are frequently considered lifestyle-complementary treatments. Diet is one of the oldest CKD treatments, and it is usually considered a part of "mainstream" management. In this narrative review we discuss how the lessons of complementary alternative medicines (CAMs) can be useful for the implementation and study of low-protein diets in CKD. While high tech medicine is mainly prescriptive, prescribing a "good" life-style change is usually not enough and comprehensive counselling is required; the empathic educational approach, on which CAMs are mainly, though not exclusively based, may support a successful personalized nutritional intervention.There is no gold-standard, low-protein diet for all CKD patients: from among a relatively vast choice, the best compliance is probably obtained by personalization. This approach interferes with the traditional RCT-based analyses which are grounded upon an assumption of equal preference of treatments (ideally blinded). Whole system approaches and narrative medicine, that are widely used in the study of CAMs, may offer ways to integrate EBM and personalised medicine in the search for innovative solutions respecting individualization, but gaining sound data, such as with partially-randomised patient preference trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 43 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2017.
All research outputs
#13,475,674
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#1,056
of 2,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,871
of 354,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#25
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,480 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.