You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Avoiding inappropriate urinary catheter use and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): a pre-post control intervention study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12913-017-2268-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vicki Parker, Michelle Giles, Laura Graham, Belinda Suthers, Wendy Watts, Tony O’Brien, Andrew Searles |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 265 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 48 | 18% |
Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
Other | 17 | 6% |
Researcher | 17 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
Other | 31 | 12% |
Unknown | 100 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 17% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
Engineering | 6 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 10% |
Unknown | 106 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,228,866
of 24,778,793 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,939
of 8,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,619
of 315,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#35
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,778,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,384 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.