You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comparative evaluation of mobile medical APPS (MMAS) for reading and interpreting malaria rapid diagnostic tests
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-020-03573-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Theodoor Visser, Sumedh Ramachandra, Emilie Pothin, Jan Jacobs, Jane Cunningham, Arnaud Le Menach, Michelle L. Gatton, Samaly dos Santos Souza, Sydney Nelson, Luke Rooney, Michael Aidoo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 33% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 11% |
India | 1 | 11% |
Cameroon | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 20% |
Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
Librarian | 2 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 12% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 5 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#5,578,937
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,360
of 5,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,098
of 505,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#29
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,643 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.