You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health economic evaluations comparing faecal microbiota transplantation with antibiotics for treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Economics Review, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13561-021-00301-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lianna Hede Hammeken, Simon Mark Dahl Baunwall, Christian Lodberg Hvas, Lars Holger Ehlers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 18 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,068,588
of 25,353,525 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#70
of 495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,926
of 522,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,353,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 495 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.