↓ Skip to main content

Striga parasitizes transgenic hairy roots of Zea mays and provides a tool for studying plant-plant interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Striga parasitizes transgenic hairy roots of Zea mays and provides a tool for studying plant-plant interactions
Published in
Plant Methods, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1746-4811-8-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Runo, Sarah Macharia, Amos Alakonya, Jesse Machuka, Neelima Sinha, Julie Scholes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 127 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Researcher 29 22%
Student > Master 29 22%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 17%
Chemical Engineering 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 13 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,048,335
of 23,063,209 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#455
of 1,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,575
of 245,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,063,209 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.