You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity: identifying oncologic benefit and an evidence-practice gap in routine clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12955-020-01648-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Miss Charlotte L. Moss, Ajay Aggarwal, Asad Qureshi, Benjamin Taylor, Teresa Guerrero-Urbano, Mieke Van Hemelrijck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 53% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 58% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,971,734
of 24,496,759 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#223
of 2,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,721
of 547,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,496,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 547,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.