↓ Skip to main content

The landscape of DNA repeat elements in human heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The landscape of DNA repeat elements in human heart failure
Published in
Genome Biology, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Syed Haider, Lina Cordeddu, Emma Robinson, Mehregan Movassagh, Lee Siggens, Ana Vujic, Mun-Kit Choy, Martin Goddard, Pietro Lio, Roger Foo

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The epigenomes of healthy and diseased human hearts were recently examined by genome-wide DNA methylation profiling. Repetitive elements, heavily methylated in post-natal tissue, have variable methylation profiles in cancer but methylation of repetitive elements in the heart has never been examined. RESULTS: We analyzed repetitive elements from all repeat families in human myocardial samples, and found that satellite repeat elements were significantly hypomethylated in end-stage cardiomyopathic hearts relative to healthy normal controls. Satellite repeat elements are almost always centromeric or juxtacentromeric, and their overexpression correlates with disease aggressiveness in cancer. Similarly, we found that hypomethylation of satellite repeat elements correlated with up to 27-fold upregulation of the corresponding transcripts in end-stage cardiomyopathic hearts. No other repeat family exhibited differential methylation between healthy and cardiomyopathic hearts, with the exception of the Alu element SINE1/7SL, for which a modestly consistent trend of increased methylation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Satellite repeat element transcripts, a form of non-coding RNA, have putative functions in maintaining genomic stability and chromosomal integrity. Further studies will be needed to establish the functional significance of these non-coding RNAs in the context of heart failure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Belgium 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Sweden 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 76 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 26%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Computer Science 4 4%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 8 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,148,499
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,257
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,729
of 191,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#41
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.