You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Severe purulent pericarditis caused by invasive Eikenella corrodens: case report and literature review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4256-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Wei, Hu Nie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,643,834
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,618
of 7,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,386
of 346,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#62
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.