↓ Skip to main content

Severe purulent pericarditis caused by invasive Eikenella corrodens: case report and literature review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Severe purulent pericarditis caused by invasive Eikenella corrodens: case report and literature review
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-4256-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wei, Hu Nie

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Unknown 13 65%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,496,763
of 20,083,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,176
of 6,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,176
of 408,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,083,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them