↓ Skip to main content

Nonurgent patients in emergency departments: rational or irresponsible consumers? Perceptions of professionals and patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonurgent patients in emergency departments: rational or irresponsible consumers? Perceptions of professionals and patients
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-525
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Claire Durand, Sylvie Palazzolo, Nicolas Tanti-Hardouin, Patrick Gerbeaux, Roland Sambuc, Stéphanie Gentile

Abstract

For several decades, overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) has been intensifying due to the increased number of patients seeking care in EDs. Demand growth is partly due to misuse of EDs by patients who seek care for nonurgent problems. This study explores the reasons why people with nonurgent complaints choose to come to EDs, and how ED health professionals perceive the phenomenon of "nonurgency".

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 44 22%
Unknown 39 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 15%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 45 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,951,048
of 24,810,360 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,249
of 4,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,046
of 178,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#30
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,810,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.