You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evidence that women meeting physical activity guidelines do not sit less: An observational inclinometry study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-9-122 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lynette L Craft, Theodore W Zderic, Susan M Gapstur, Erik H VanIterson, Danielle M Thomas, Juned Siddique, Marc T Hamilton |
Abstract |
The inactivity physiology paradigm proposes that sedentary behaviors, including sitting too much, are independent of the type of physical activity delineated for health in the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Thus, we hypothesized that, when accounting for behaviors across the entire day, variability in the amount of time spent sitting would be independent of the inter-and intra-individual time engaged in sustained moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 21% |
Netherlands | 4 | 17% |
United States | 4 | 17% |
Canada | 2 | 8% |
Norway | 1 | 4% |
India | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 63% |
Scientists | 5 | 21% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 128 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 19% |
Student > Master | 21 | 16% |
Researcher | 19 | 14% |
Professor | 12 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 21% |
Unknown | 19 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 21% |
Sports and Recreations | 23 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Psychology | 8 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#612,520
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#180
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,275
of 191,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.