You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What makes a ‘successful’ collaborative research project between public health practitioners and academics? A mixed-methods review of funding applications submitted to a local intervention evaluation scheme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-00671-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter van der Graaf, Lindsay Blank, Eleanor Holding, Elizabeth Goyder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 38% |
| Ireland | 2 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 11 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 22% |
| Unknown | 18 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,581,130
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#336
of 1,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,196
of 534,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 534,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.